Watercolor paintings with surprising designs, color arrays, and surface
textures can be achieved using a new saltwater technique (see the test images on
this page and the paintings in the galleries).
Brief
Description of the Method
(a) Dissolve a salt in water.
(b) Add watercolor pigment to the solution.
(c) Paint a paper surface with the mixture.
(d) Allow it to dry.
(e) Coat with a clear shellac.
With certain
choices and
amounts of materials,
painted areas can be obtained, for example, that consist of darker,
pigment-rich "spots" distributed throughout a lighter-pigmented
field. The "spots" actually turn out to be
crystalline salt particles that are well cemented to the paper, thus
giving it a uniquely granulated, rough-feeling surface. With
other mixtures, especially those containing more than one pigment,
surprising and visually exciting results are obtained. These are
described in more detail below.
Detailed
Description of the Method
Salts and
Solutions:
The grade of common salt
(sodium chloride) used was “Coarse Kosher Salt” from Morton
International; solutions of this grade were clear. This was
preferred over Morton’s “Iodized Salt” which has 3 major impurities;
solutions of this grade were cloudy. (Crystal growth is normally
better when fewer impurities are present.) The sodium chloride solutions
that were used were about 90-95% saturated. (Results were
similar, although less pronounced, when lower concentrations were
used.) Typically, solutions were prepared from about 1.3 oz. of
sodium chloride and 4.0 oz. of water.
The copper sulfate used was a commercial
grade. Similarly, the most often used copper sulfate solution was
about 90-95% saturated. It was prepared from about 0.8 oz. of
copper sulfate and 4.0 oz. of water.
The watercolor pigments used
were obtained from several manufacturers: Winsor-Newton, DaVinci,
Rembrandt, and Holbein. Most often, the pigments were squeezed
out of their tubes and allowed to dry (“harden-up”) over time in air at
ambient temperatures on plastic palettes. Wetted brushes were
then used to pick up some of the pigment and mix it with salt solutions.
Salt areas are coated with a clear shellac such as
that produced by William Zinsser & Co., Inc., Somerset, NJ.
It is available as a water/alcohol solution so, technically, it is
another water medium. (See "Other Observations" below for more
information about the coating.)
Test Example 1:
Using a wetted #4-Round
watercolor brush, some
pigment was combined with about 0.1 oz. of an almost saturated solution
(see above) of sodium chloride in water. The amount of pigment
(or the number of pigment-wetted brushfulls) used varied with the
intensity of the color desired on the final painted surface. The
resulting mixture was then thickly coated (puddled) onto test squares
(1.5” x 1.5”) on Strathmore 140-lb. cold-press watercolor paper and
allowed to dry slowly at about 75% relative humidity. Table 1
lists pigments used, whether they were transparent
or opaque, and the result obtained for each. Some representative
digital scans (about 1.5x actual size) are also included below.
Each transparent pigment
example gave the deepest (highest pigmented) color at the exact
randomly dispersed spots where the cemented sodium chloride crystals
appeared and a lighter colored (lower pigmented) overall background
field upon which the crystals had grown.
On the other hand, each opaque
pigment example resulted in a test square having relatively uniform
overall color with randomly dispersed, cemented sodium chloride
crystals that were either the same color, lighter, or almost colorless.
Table 1
|
|
|
|
|
Pigment
#
|
Description |
T/O |
Mfr
|
Results
|
1
|
Permanent Red Deep
|
T
|
R
|
See note 1
|
2
|
Permanent Red
|
T
|
DV
|
See note 1 |
3
|
Scarlet Lake
|
T
|
WN
|
See note 1 |
4
|
Permanent Alizarin
Crimson
|
T
|
WN
|
See note 1
|
5
|
Quinacridone Red
|
T
|
WN
|
See note 1 |
6
|
Permanent Rose
|
T
|
WN
|
See note 1
|
7
|
Quinacridone
Magenta
|
T
|
WN
|
See note 1
|
8
|
Perylene Maroon
|
T
|
WN
|
See note 1
|
9
|
Thioindigo Violet
|
T
|
WN
|
See note 1 |
10
|
Winsor Violet
|
T
|
WN |
See note 1 |
11
|
Perm. Magenta
(Quinacridone)
|
O
|
DV
|
See note 2
|
12
|
Winsor Blue (Green
Shade)
|
T
|
WN |
See note 1 |
13
|
Winsor Blue (Red
Shade)
|
T
|
WN |
See note 1 |
14
|
Winsor Green (Blue
Shade)
|
O
|
WN |
See note 2
|
15
|
Winsor Green
(Yellow Shade)
|
T
|
WN |
See note 1 |
16
|
Winsor Yellow Deep
|
T
|
WN |
See note 1 |
17
|
Benzimida Orange
|
T
|
DV
|
See note 1 |
18
|
Winsor Lemon
|
T
|
WN |
See note 1 |
19
|
Lemon Yellow
|
O
|
WN |
See note 2
|
| 20 |
Acrylide Yellow
|
T
|
DV
|
See note 1 |
Note 1: Deeply colored crystals and lighter
colored background.
Note 2:
Relatively uniform color throughout with
the same or lighter colored crystals.
T=Transparent;
O=Opaque. The assignments
come mostly from the manufacturers designations
or from Hilary Page’s
book: “Guide to Watercolor Paints”, Watson-Guptill Publications, New
York, 1996.
Manufacturer
(Mfr): DV=DaVinci; WN=Winsor-Newton; R=Rembrandt.
Using a wetted
#4-Round watercolor brush, some
pigment was combined with about 0.1 oz. of an almost saturated solution
of copper sulfate in water. The amount of pigment (or the number
of pigment-wetted brushfulls) used varied with the intensity of the
color desired on the final painted surface. The
resulting mixture was then thickly coated (puddled) onto test squares
(1.5” x 1.5”) on Strathmore 140-lb. cold-press watercolor paper and
allowed to dry slowly at about 75% relative humidity. Table 2 lists
the pigments used. The corresponding
digital scans (about 2x actual size) of each test square
are also included below.
Each transparent pigment
combination resulted in deeply colored, cemented crystals of copper
sulfate. The inherent light blue color of the copper sulfate
crystals themselves was clearly overwhelmed by each pigment
color. Also, as in the case of the sodium chloride examples, a
much lighter colored overall background field surrounded the crystals.
The designs obtained (see
scans) are a consequence of how much the wet paper buckled and how the
aqueous mixtures flowed during drying.
Table 2
|
|
|
|
Pigment #
|
Description
|
T/O
|
Mfr
|
4
|
Permanent
Alizarin Crimson
|
T |
WN
|
7
|
Quinacridone
Magenta
|
T
|
WN
|
9
|
Thioindigo
Violet
|
T
|
WN
|
12
|
Winsor Blue
(Green Shade)
|
T
|
WN
|
T=Transparent; O=Opaque. The assignments
come mostly from the manufacturers designations or from Hilary Page’s
book: “Guide to Watercolor Paints”, Watson-Guptill Publications, New
York, 1996.
WN=Winsor-Newton
Test Example 3:
Using a wetted #4-Round
watercolor brush, some of
each of two pigments, one opaque (in this example, a nickel
titanate-based Lemon Yellow was used) and one transparent, was combined
with about 0.1 oz. of an almost saturated solution of sodium chloride
in water. The amount of each pigment (or the number of
pigment-wetted brushfulls) used varied with the intensity and shade of
the color desired on the final painted surface. The
resulting mixture was then thickly coated (puddled) onto test squares
(1.5” x 1.5”) on Strathmore 140-lb. cold-press watercolor paper and
allowed to dry slowly at about 75% relative humidity. Table 3 lists
the pigments used. A few
representative digital scans (about 1.5x actual
size) are also included below.
Each example
resulted in
cemented crystals of sodium chloride that were quite deeply-colored
with the transparent pigment’s color and a yellow-colored overall
background field, from the opaque pigment #19, upon which the crystals
had grown. This separation of
color upon drying is
remarkable. It also occurs in numerous other cases when a
transparent and an opaque pigment are combined.
Table 3
|
|
|
|
Pigment
#
|
Description (All
Transparent)
|
Mfr
|
Opaque
Pigment*
|
1
|
Permanent Red Deep
|
R
|
19
|
2
|
Permanent Red
|
DV
|
19 |
3
|
Scarlet Lake
|
WN
|
19 |
4
|
Permanent Alizarin
Crimson
|
WN |
19 |
5
|
Quinacridone Red
|
WN |
19 |
6
|
Permanent Rose
|
WN |
19 |
7
|
Quinacridone
Magenta
|
WN |
19 |
8
|
Perylene Maroon
|
WN |
19 |
9
|
Thioindigo Violet
|
WN |
19 |
10
|
Winsor Violet
|
WN |
19 |
12
|
Winsor Blue (Green
Shade)
|
WN |
19 |
13
|
Winsor Blue (Red
Shade)
|
WN |
19 |
15
|
Winsor Green
(Yellow Shade)
|
WN |
19 |
16
|
Winsor Yellow Deep
|
WN |
19 |
17
|
Benzimida Orange
|
DV
|
19 |
21
|
Carmine
|
H
|
19 |
22
|
Alizarin Crimson
|
WN |
19 |
23
|
Vermillion
|
R
|
19 |
24
|
Permanent Sap Green
|
WN |
19 |
25
|
Payne's Gray
|
WN |
19 |
* Lemon Yellow (Winsor-Newton; nickel titanate
based).
DV=DaVinci;
WN=Winsor-Newton; R=Rembrandt;
H=Holbein.
Discussion
Background:
Traditionally, watercolorists
have achieved an
interesting effect by sprinkling salt (sodium chloride) granules on wet
areas of watercolor pigment on paper. The effect is described in
numerous “How-To” watercolor books and in U. S. Patent #5,362,518:
“Method for Watercolor Painting Using Rock Salt”, Rodney J. Johnson,
Nov. 8, 1994. Visually, “star-like” light to white (the original
paper surface) areas begin to appear and grow from the spot where the
individual salt granules lay on the wet surface. This is the
result of small amounts of salt dissolving from each crystal creating a
salt concentration gradient that forces the hydrophilic pigment
molecules away from the crystal toward lower salt concentrations.
(With many other types of organic molecules, this phenomenon is often
referred to as the “salting-out effect.”) The ultimate size of
the light to white areas depends on the wetness of the paper and the
rate of drying. Eventually, when the surface is dry, there is
almost no adhesion of these salt granules to the paper and they are
easily brushed away.
Summary:
A new method has been developed
which produces
novel designs, color arrays, and textures in watercolor
paintings. The process involves first completely dissolving a
salt (e.g.: sodium chloride, copper sulfate, etc.) in water, combining
the resulting solution with watercolor pigments, painting a
watercolor paper surface, allowing it to dry, and then protecting it with a
coating of clear shellac.
In the case of
mostly transparent (i.e.: mostly
soluble in the aqueous salt solution) pigments, the resulting solutions
were spread on watercolor paper and allowed to dry. As the water
evaporated, crystals of the salt began to grow from the paper
surface. At the same time, the pigment color tended to
concentrate at each crystal. When all of the water had
evaporated, the painted area showed dark-colored, pigment-rich
crystalline spots distributed throughout a relatively light-colored,
pigment-poorer field. Furthermore, the crystalline particles were
well cemented to the paper resulting in a unique granulated,
rough-feeling textured surface.
With mostly opaque
(i.e.: well-dispersed but
mostly insoluble in the aqueous salt solution) pigments, the resulting
solutions/suspensions were spread on watercolor paper and allowed to
dry. As the water evaporated, crystals of the salt, as above,
began to grow on the paper surface but, in these cases, little
differential distributions of the pigments occurred. The
resulting painted areas showed relatively uniform color plus salt
crystals; the latter were either about the same color as the rest of
the painted area, lighter, or, in some cases, almost colorless. Once
again, these crystalline particles were well cemented to the paper thus
giving it a unique granulated, rough-feeling textured surface.
With mixtures of
more than one pigment, unexpected
and striking results were obtained. For example, when a
highly transparent (mostly soluble in salt solution) and a highly
opaque (mostly insoluble in salt solution) pigment were used together
and the resulting mixture was spread on watercolor paper and allowed to
dry, the transparent pigment tended to concentrate at the growing salt
crystals while the opaque pigment produced a continuous background
field of color.
In all cases, the
size and shape of the final
crystals depended on the material used and on several other parameters,
namely drying rates, impurity levels, presence of seed crystals,
pigments, initial concentration, how undisturbed the surfaces were
during drying, etc. With sodium chloride, most of the crystals
were cubic and smaller than 1 mm in largest dimension, although some of
up to about 3 mm have been observed. With copper sulfate, the
crystals appeared to be elongated, pointed shapes in the 1-20 mm
range. Other salts gave other shapes and size ranges. In
general, the height that the crystals grew out above the paper surface
ranged from about 0.1 mm to about 1 mm, thus producing a painted area
with a distinct textural feeling.
Other Observations:
All paintings produced by this overall technique are
matted and framed the same way as any other watercolor renderings.
As mentioned at the outset, salt areas
are coated with a clear shellac that is typically available in a
water/alcohol solution and, technically, is just another water
medium.
The reason for the coating is two-fold: (1) to minimize moisture
absorption by the salt and (2) to protect it from accidental abrasion
(even though it is already fairly well cemented to the paper through
this method). About 20 different coatings were tried before
settling on the shellac. First, it worked about the best in its
salt-protecting capacity, probably because its chemical makeup allows
it to bond most effectively with the polar salt particle
surfaces. Second, being available in a water/alcohol mixture
means that the solvent evaporates quickly and leaves no odor.
Most of the other coating materials that worked almost as well:
polyurethanes, acrylic lacquers, varnishes, etc., are sold in petroleum
distillate mixtures that are comparatively quite noxious during coating
and leave long-lasting objectionable odors. A few latex mixtures
were also tried but these caused significant dissolving and running of
the previously dried watercolor paints.
Many other salts were explored. They included ammonium chloride,
calcium acetate, calcium
chloride, potassium chloride, potassium acid phthalate, potassium
sulfate, potassium citrate, sodium bromide, sodium sulfate, sodium
citrate, sodium benzoate, strontium chloride, sodium carbonate,
aluminum sulfate, and magnesium sulfate. Initial results with
these salts
were less interesting than those with sodium chloride and copper
sulfate.
Pigments that watercolorists
have traditionally
called “transparent” were almost always found to be quite soluble in
water and saltwater. Pigments that have traditionally been
designated as “opaque” were almost always found to be quite insoluble
(although usually well-dispersed) in water or saltwater.
Pigment formulations known traditionally as “semi-transparent” or
“semi-opaque” were found to have soluble as well as insoluble
components in water or saltwater. That is, part settled out of a
solution upon standing while the solution itself remained quite rich in
color.
In general, the
more soluble the pigment was in
the saltwater, the larger the differential distribution of pigment was
between the crystals and their surrounding areas.
The largest
crystals in the
dried painted areas were generally obtained by (a) using the purest
possible crystalline materials, (b) using the highest possible aqueous
concentration of the crystalline materials, and (c) using a relatively
thick layer (a puddle) of the dissolved crystalline
material/water/pigment on the painted surface. It has also been
noted that the size of the crystals can be affected by the particular
choice of the watercolor paper used.
If one allows the
pigment/saltwater mixture to
stand too long on a palette, some water will evaporate and some salt
crystals will begin to form. If you then paint the mixture on
paper, these preformed crystals will act as seeds that will initiate
the growth of many crystals, all of which will be tiny, instead of the
fewer larger ones normally produced.
One should try not
to move the painted paper until
it is dry. Such movement will also tend to create too many seeds
that will initiate the growth of too many tiny crystals.
I
hope that anyone interested in trying this method will enjoy it as much
as I have. I would be most interested in hearing and seeing what
others can achieve using it. Email
address: rellesh@yahoo.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Random Technical
Musings:
It is possible that the
above-described cemented
crystals began their growth from the lowest level to which the
solutions had penetrated into the paper, namely from several layers
deep into the cellulose fibers. During this early growth, it is
also possible that either strong ion-molecule coordination was
established between the crystalline component (for example: sodium
chloride) and the numerous hydroxyl groups of the cellulose
chains/fibers, or that some of the chains/fibers actually became
encapsulated by the crystals as they began to grew up and out of the
paper. In any event, something special must have occurred to
explain why the salt crystals end up so well cemented to the dried
paper.
The tendency of
transparent (mostly soluble)
pigments to concentrate at the salt crystals is perhaps more
complex. During the drying, the last areas with visible wetness
were minute “puddles” surrounding each of the growing crystals.
These puddles were much darker (more pigment-rich) than their
surroundings and, of course, saturated in salt. The puzzle then
is why is the transparent (soluble) organic pigment drawn there since,
as mentioned in the Background section, salt tends to drive organic
pigments away when placed on a film of pigment and water.
The tendency of
opaque (mostly
insoluble) pigments to not concentrate at growing crystals is probably
because, as insoluble particles, they simply settle out on the
paper early and then never move.
Again,
I'd welcome your communications about any aspect of this
method.
Email address: rellesh@yahoo.com